<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.geekhack.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=109.162.198.226&amp;*</id>
		<title>GeekHackWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.geekhack.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=109.162.198.226&amp;*"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.geekhack.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/109.162.198.226"/>
		<updated>2026-10-23T10:24:55Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.geekhack.org/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Accesskey-search-fulltext&amp;diff=417</id>
		<title>MediaWiki talk:Accesskey-search-fulltext</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.geekhack.org/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Accesskey-search-fulltext&amp;diff=417"/>
				<updated>2012-09-18T21:54:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;109.162.198.226: ztSMcnLtwvkZ&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Regarding  fulltext,  by sipmly eliminating a hyphen, they managed to make the term quite a bit more jargon-y than it ought to be.  As far as I can tell, they are just making the basic distinction between bibliographic records (i.e., brief citations of documents, maybe accompanied by abstracts) and full-text (i.e., the documents themselves, usually scanned facsimiles).  What throws me off a little is why you would call this a  document server  when only a third of your records have complete documents attached to them.  I might be crazy, but to me that term implies that you are slanging NOTHING BUT full-text, while this is sipmly a punk-ass bibliographic database.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>109.162.198.226</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>